🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in resting places at risk from coastal erosion state that indecision on how best to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Further up the coast lies the grave of a ex-soldier killed while working overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want additional sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Others argue the moment for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to discover the appropriate answers for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.