🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the Britain, and it feels like it’s time for a reassessment. Throughout its history, an celebration that began as a celebration and reminder of history, culture and the connections between international African diaspora communities, has developed a commercial tone, expanding to include functions where individuals of African heritage are paid to speak with predominantly white listeners about hidden biases and active solidarity. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests sparked an increase in the industry of displaying cultural sensitivity. But even that moment has passed. The surge has reached its height, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Origins of Black History Observance

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with a week of celebration and reflection in the second week of February. Black History Month developed from this movement and was publicly established in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the US and Canada in February, but also in October in the United Kingdom, Germany, Éire and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The month has transformed since its inception, focusing less on the histories of the slave trade across the Atlantic and civil rights battles, and more on prominent Black figures in government, the arts, and social movements, and extensively acknowledging the impact Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in schools where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with lectures and artistic activities. But the manner the observance is celebrated is a manifestation of the political moment. How it develops is a good lesson in how co-option leads to weakening: the transformation of Black History Month has impeded the point of it, which is to address systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how crucial it is to reconsider Black History Month better than the particular moment in which it takes place this year. In the UK, a revitalized conservative movement in the guise of the Reform political group is top in opinion ratings. In the recent season we saw the biggest extreme right demonstration in the history of Britain. the Conservative leader, the Black leader of the right-wing political group, is a strong critic of anti-racism activism, and we are in a situation where a member of parliament feels empowered to declare that a lack of white people in specific city neighborhoods is a cause for alarm. At the same time, extreme conservative groups are surging in the European continent as a entirety.

In the America, a colossal assault against DEI and affirmative action has been taken, frequently with success, to the supreme judicial bodies of the state. A drive to remove the history of people of color and experience from the records is in progress. One of the former president's first executive orders targeted the museum of African American legacy, and the Smithsonian Institution, accusing them of a “concerted and widespread effort to alter the country's historical narrative” by depicting the United States “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

In this context, the celebration illustrates how minimally it can be influential if it is limited to either dutiful corporate observances, or depoliticized commemorations of historical achievements, rather than addressing the realities of the contemporary world. It also shows how its limited duration means that it is disconnected from the more extensive continuous action that is needed. An academic expert, a educator at an educational institution, articulated it most accurately when she raised concerns about the fleeting superficial actions of the month. “The problem with taking a tokenistic approach”, she commented, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month turns into a fleeting performance rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Establishing how to adapt, revise and extend efforts for equal rights and acknowledgment in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a challenging endeavor. There is a temptation to just eliminate events including Black History Month entirely, thinking they are inadequate for current needs, or are remnants of an era that has failed to deliver.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and tradition of campaigns for equality – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and certainly, even commercial engagements – constitute an foundation that a significant effort has been dedicated to. It is there not merely to decline as the situation evolves (and in fact, declines), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month look like? Firstly, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is spread out throughout the annual calendar (as some institutions are already starting to implement), parts of its content (particularly around notable African descendants) integrated into school curriculums. It would also be a time that does not avoid political issues, and allows opportunity for people, particularly young people, to share their anxieties and narratives. What purpose serves simple recognition of the bygone era when it fails to address the present reality of far-right rallies in the public spaces? Organizations who observe it should not be pacified with the passive language of “unconscious bias” and sensitivity to “microaggressions”, but faced with the dangers that affect everyone if opposition to discrimination is not treated with importance. To summarize, Black History Month should be made current, pressing, and reactive. Maybe an complete renaming is necessary – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.